Dr. Cheryl Lentz: Tips for Graduate Writing: Scope and Limitations of Your Study


Video Tips for Post Graduate Writing: Scope
and Limitations of Your Study Hello and welcome back! My name is Dr. Cheryl
Lentz, owner of The Refractive Thinker® Press. Today our focus for Tips for Post Graduate
Writing is on the scope and limitations as offered in Chapter 1 and reviewed again in
Chapter 5 in the Graduate Thesis format and for most Doctoral Dissertations.
The scope and limitations are very important to the nature of your study. As your study
begins with your problem statement and purpose statement—outlining the reason and direction
for your study, your study must also indicate its limitations. In addition to what your
study intends to accomplish, a discussion of what your study intends not to accomplish
is of importance and value as well. What are the boundaries that perhaps the design of
your study may not allow? These could include
(1) Sampling. Is your sampling a non-probability or purposeful sampling for example? Why?
a. Perhaps it was not cost effective to survey all members of the organization?
b. Perhaps it was not time efficient to survey all members of the organization?
(2) Perhaps there is a limitation in the scope and validity of your survey instrument?
(3) Perhaps there are limitations to your choice of methodology?
a. Example: For the Delphi Technique, the literature review as offered by my dissertation
found four primary limitations to the use of the standard Delphi Technique as offered
by authors Nekolaichuk, Fainsinger, and Lawlor (2005).
b. As a result of these limitations, great care was taken with the ability to generalize
the resultant findings when discussed in Chapter 5
Remember, there is often confusion by what is meant by delimitations (those characteristics
and details about your study that may limit the scope or define your specific boundaries)
of your particular study and limitations (those elements that may limit what you can say about
the results). Just by defining your problem statement in any particular way, you are potentially
limiting the scope, boundaries, or parameters for your study. There are many approaches
you could consider. By taking your particular approach, you are committing to a particular
scope of action and path that you will be traveling. You will need to clearly define
what you intend to study as well as what you do not. Be very specific in both areas for
your reader to clearly understand your intents on both levels.
Limitations by contrast are what elements will affect the ability for your study to
generalize the results. What conclusions will you be able to draw from your study within
your specific boundaries? Let’s consider your sample population for example. Is your
sample large enough? Remember that Creswell (2002) indicated that “approximately 30
participants for a correlational study that relates variables (p. 168) would be acceptable
as an appropriate sample size. Anything less and this could potentially limit the validity
of your study to expand much beyond its initial population sample. Remember our goal is what our study can add
to the general body of knowledge at its conclusion. What will we be able to offer about our study
as a result of our various choices with regard to the consideration of your study’s problem
statement, purpose statement, methodology, sample size, and population? Please be sure
to spend some time in thought with regard to these areas.
References Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research:
Planning, conducting, and evaluation quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson. Nekolaichuk, C., Fainsinger, R., & Lawlor,
P. (2005, October). A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced
cancer patients using content experts: The Edmonton Classification System for cancer
pain. Palliative Medicine, 19(6), 466-476. Let me once again invite you to find at least
three sample studies from your respective university that mirrors your study for you
to closely follow its logic, format, and overall organization, presentation, subheading titles,
and perhaps design. The sample studies will offer delimitations and limitations for your
study to consider further. For more tips on effective post graduate writing,
to include both videos and transcripts, please visit my blog at http://refractivethinker.com/wordpress.
Thank you for joining me. Again my name is Dr. Cheryl Lentz. I have enjoyed our time
together and I hope you find these suggestions for crafting an effective doctoral dissertation
or graduate thesis within this video helpful. Much continued success and luck to you as
your academic and professional journeys continue. With respect, Cheryl
Dr. Cheryl Lentz Chief Refractive Thinker®
The Refractive Thinker® Press, where discriminating scholars publish.
Join me: Twitter , Linked In , My Blog , My Website , & Facebook

5 Replies to “Dr. Cheryl Lentz: Tips for Graduate Writing: Scope and Limitations of Your Study

  1. Dear Madam, your channel is very helpful. Please, is it compulsory to put the literature review in the introduction. I'm doing PhD and I was thinking of putting that together 'Background of the study' in chapter 1. What do you advise?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *